pwnd.
I'm torn on cases like this. The final number handed down by the jury is obviously ridiculous, and I'm honestly quite surprised that a jury of average citizens would choose a punishment that so obviously doesn't fit the crime--no way in hell this lady did 1.92 million in damages to the recording industry.
But at the same time, this lady is an idiot for not settling for the $3-5k the RIAA apparently offered earlier in the case. Whether or not you agree with the RIAA's tactics, there can be no question in anyone's mind that she was committing copyright infringement, and when you are unquestionably legally liable for millions of dollars in fines, you'd be a fool not to settle for a miniscule fraction of that number.