I was thinking the same thing Picklz. Andy's actions..... seem to be questionable.I guess Andy and Jay both make valid points that Kris' post is probably the most outright scummy thing we have right now. Andy pushing for a swift vote concerns me greatly because unless you are scum and see a possible town being lynched, more time to gather information on your vote seems like it would always be a good thing.
I agree.
Thom, why are you going around and around with JT. He has done nothing more scummy then you.
I sense we have scum hiding in plain site.
I don't think that is scummy. He is just compiling the information from past posting into his post to show the fact that a person has called themselves scum. That to me is not something we can look past
I was thinking the same thing Picklz. Andy's actions..... seem to be questionable.
What picklz said. Pushing the vote on Kris means one of two things. Either you're town, think he's scum, and want him gone. OR- you're scum, know he's town, and want him gone. The general push to the swift vote, unfortunately did not help your case. I'm half tempted to swing my vote to Kris to see what happens, because that'd likely cause a hammer vote today. I won't though, because I still think there are some other questions that need to be answered.My actions are questionable? Doubtful that my vote for Kris raises any questions. I think I clearly explained why I voted for him. Others voted for him before me and others continue contemplating doing the same. We are all thinking about voting for Kris. I just have chosen to move forward with my decision.
Pushing for a vote might been questionable, but my push was to rally discussion and or decisions for our first night. It felt that majority of us were thinking about lynching Kris. I did nothing more than assert what everyone is ho humming about.
I think you're right. I think the scum.... whoever they are, may have found sufficient cause to knock down a town, namely me. With me out of the way, there's virtually no one questioning anything anyone else does, and scum comes in for the easy kill. I'll be surprise if I survive the night, if I don't already get lynched on this vote. I'd put money on scum waiting for two more town votes, and then hammering me down. My REAL question is- what is swanny's motivation? Comes in, votes me, and disappears? Funny how that works.WOW
Look at the votes fly now. I think this is the dreaded paranoia we have seen before.
It is funny how it works isn't it? I was thinking either you or JT were scum and the more I read the more and more I think you are one of the scum members. Attacking a fellow scum (JT) wouldn't make sense. I could be off base, but its the nature of the game.I think you're right. I think the scum.... whoever they are, may have found sufficient cause to knock down a town, namely me. With me out of the way, there's virtually no one questioning anything anyone else does, and scum comes in for the easy kill. I'll be surprise if I survive the night, if I don't already get lynched on this vote. I'd put money on scum waiting for two more town votes, and then hammering me down. My REAL question is- what is swanny's motivation? Comes in, votes me, and disappears? Funny how that works.
Splitting up the pressure doesn't allow a quick bang bang vote to get rid of someone. The more I think of Kris's post the more I think it was to stir reaction and get discussion going. However I am always very confused to start these games until roles can start popping out a bit more. I wanted to use my vote for someone and was coming in here to vote for either Tom or JT until I read the last page.Not sure what part of placing a vote constitutes paranoia. My vote was based upon the dialog of this thread - and the fact of the matter is we are coming up on < 24 hours left before we HAVE to vote, unless you are advocating no Lynch, in which case I will be extremely suspect of you because no lynch on Day 1 is way better for Scum than Town.
I am a little curious as to Josh's vote w/ no explanation or anything.
Also I think the scum would be best served by Josh and I voting Kris, since he already has two votes and seemingly more people feeling he is scum, now it's split. Also remember you can change your vote at anytime, which I may do because I still feel like Kris might be the smart vote on Day 1. I'm just extremely suspicious of Tom's actions.
To be honest, I'm fishing....I have a few theories on the scum behavior/pairings and wanted to see what a 2 vs 2 vote would do. Reading this thread in 40 post/page is helpful to see the day split and discussion shifts (as scum can talk to each other at night)...I got no problem being the target, if the bent is to stir discussion. Hell, I'm all for it. As far as NL, no thanks. Like I said right at outset when JT suggested it out of the box- it's a bad idea. Everyone agreeing to NL means no discussion. No discussion means scum gets free kills w/o having to do a damn thing for it. As for those that DO choose to vote for me, what would you like clarified? I'd be happy to answer any and all questions related to my actions. I ain't skurred.