LOL
You haven't posted a single argument that wasn't completely ridiculous. I had to decipher your "dramatic" statements and post the facts myself. As I said before, I'm aware of the issues that you attempted to bring up, but not everyone is. If I wanted to discuss it with myself, I wouldn't have created a thread about it.
Let's see:
If you enjoyed AOL style internet access, where Steve Jobs controls how you see the web, and your the type of person who likes living in a gated community, then this phone is for you!
I invited you to actually make the argument (in a tone similar to your's, I would say), and how did you respond?
So your disputing the fact that Apple and Steve Jobs limit what can be done and see on the internet on an iphone and that Apple is helping causing internet fragmentation or are you trying to ignore negitive facts and are attempting to limit open discussion? Cause I see my post as being On Point, as it directly relates to the iphone and apple.
Again, I don't see any supporting facts or examples of what you're even talking about. Arguement that apple doesn't support flash, I think. So I covered that in a way that presents the information logically. And you went into hiding... until this:
Thank you Jesse for putting the time into this arguement, you said it much better then I. Steve Jobs would fit in well in China
And the Genuis Bar, how fucking smug and arrogent is that? Kind of like going around and correcting peoples spelling mistakes.
I guess when you recap...
You: post a ridiculous statement.
Me: Remind you this is onpoint, correct spelling.
You: Attempt to make an arguement but leave out facts. Further ridiculous statements.
Me: Attempt to decipher your attempt to make a point, provide facts.
You: Go into hiding and come back with more useless posts and personal attacks.
Yup.
