My thoughts overall, as a semi-not-incompetent-mafia-player.
AJ seemed pretty scummy to me. He almost never took a stand against anyone and he seemed to be voting on whoever had the most heat at the time. He did almost zero scum hunting on his own.
Josh's vote analysis was actually pretty good. Had he used numbers to indicate the timing of when people voted for who, it would have probably been more potent. When I looked at it, there was a pretty interesting correlation between the votes of the two scum... but my view of it may have been skewed by knowing who they were.
Tom's posts rubbed me the wrong way a lot. Nearly every post he just says "its either this, or this, or this", but I don't recall him ever saying "i think this is the case". It's nice to point out a million possibilities, I tend to do that as well, but why no one asked him what he actually thought about the scenarios was interesting to me. Also, what is the purpose of challenging people to see who is the most town? You're only creating chaos amongst what is statistically another townie. As Eddy said numerous times, where is the evidence? It's not a "who's got the biggest boner for town" contest. Cool, you are willing to bet $20 you are town, but that doesn't actually prove you are town. Further, you have to analyze intent more than just "is this scummy". Almost everyone is going to do something that COULD be scummy. Don't analyze things and try to see how you can MAKE it scummy. Look for shit that is scummy and then poke it.
Eddy played GREAT. He was doing it right. Granted he didn't get scum, I think given more time he would have led the town to victory.
I don't really have other strong thoughts on specific things.
I'm not sure how I feel about the 1 week long days. I think people would get bored quickly with longer days, but it'd probably be easier on town to have more time to discuss things.
