W
WhiteSpy9
Guest
Track and field came out for the 360 in the Arcade!
W
WhiteSpy9
Guest
Mario vs Sonic is fail....
StealthSpeed3
Charge THIS!!
I could go for a little WiiFit. Whenever it finally comes to the US
Picklz
SUDO Make me a SAMCH
My Vote would be for Guitar Hero 3, Wii Sports, Mario Kart, and Goldeneye.
Reasoning:
GH3 Because Its the game a number of people have, and also cross-platform so those with only x360 or Wii can still have played it.
Wii Sports is good fun, and resonably easy to get the hang of.
Mario Kart because, well, its Mario Kart, I'm willing to bet most have played it. For those that havent its a real easy game to pickup and get the hang of without learning proper drifting techniques.
Finally Goldeneye, best FPS Console game ever IMO, its classic, pretty easy and tons of fun.
dmention7
Hater
How about the overall structure? I do like the idea of teams, like the real olympics, because that way, even if someone sucks ass at a game (I've played Goldeneye maybe 4 times evar) the team can be competitive overall.
Once we get the list of games narrowed down (I think 4-5 is a good number), then maybe we can get a list of for-sure participants, and start to figure out how we can set up some evenly-matched teams. Perhaps, each person could rank the games we are using from 1-5 in order of their adeptness at each game. That would give us a start at being able to put teams together. From that point, I say it would be up to the individual team to strategize practices and sub-teams (for coop games), etc.
Another consideration for games: ones that have multiple possible "events" would be a plus. For example, different levels or gameplay styles. One-on-one and coop modes, etc.
Once we get the list of games narrowed down (I think 4-5 is a good number), then maybe we can get a list of for-sure participants, and start to figure out how we can set up some evenly-matched teams. Perhaps, each person could rank the games we are using from 1-5 in order of their adeptness at each game. That would give us a start at being able to put teams together. From that point, I say it would be up to the individual team to strategize practices and sub-teams (for coop games), etc.
Another consideration for games: ones that have multiple possible "events" would be a plus. For example, different levels or gameplay styles. One-on-one and coop modes, etc.
Last edited:
mndsm
I'M OFFENDED!
Right. Using me as an example- i'd say a 5 @ Wii sports (have you seen me dominate bowling?) a 2 at Goldeneye ( I can't stand that fucking game) 5 at Burnout (I've beaten every Burnout. EVER.) 4-5 @ Mario Party (I can whup ass at strategy, but sometimes lack at mini-games) a 2-3 @ GH, mebbe a 2 since i've never played GH3 for more than 10 minutes. Put the ranks up, set captains, and call it!
mndsm
I'M OFFENDED!
Make that Marvel vs. Capcom 2 and it's ON. Or Mortal Kombat 3.
upgtx
New Member
Hater... You do need a fighting game though.The next asshat that posts OMG THIS GAME is getting the uncle morty treatment!!!
In all honesty though, ranking yourself on each game might work out, but we need to get a Set list of games first to do that!
dmention7
Hater
I suck at fighting games. Motion denied!
StealthSpeed3
Charge THIS!!
one racing, one FPS, WiiSports, GH3 (which i have yet to play btw), and one fighting. One game from each main genre.
but we also need a witness present from one of the other teams to make sure that there is no cheating going on.
but we also need a witness present from one of the other teams to make sure that there is no cheating going on.